1982 Ford Thunderbird vs. 2003 MCC Smart
To start off, 2003 MCC Smart is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Ford Thunderbird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Ford Thunderbird would be higher. At 3,791 cc (6 cylinders), 1982 Ford Thunderbird is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Ford Thunderbird (118 HP) has 12 more horse power than 2003 MCC Smart. (106 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1982 Ford Thunderbird should accelerate faster than 2003 MCC Smart. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Ford Thunderbird weights approximately 473 kg more than 2003 MCC Smart. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1982 Ford Thunderbird is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 Ford Thunderbird. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 MCC Smart, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1982 Ford Thunderbird (252 Nm) has 107 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 MCC Smart. (145 Nm). This means 1982 Ford Thunderbird will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 MCC Smart. 1982 Ford Thunderbird has automatic transmission and 2003 MCC Smart has manual transmission. 2003 MCC Smart will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1982 Ford Thunderbird will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Ford Thunderbird | 2003 MCC Smart | |
Make | Ford | MCC |
Model | Thunderbird | Smart |
Year Released | 1982 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3791 cc | 1499 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 118 HP | 106 HP |
Torque | 252 Nm | 145 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 96.6 mm | 75 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 86.4 mm | 84.8 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.7:1 | 10.5:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1448 kg | 975 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5100 mm | 3760 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2510 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 80 L | 47 L |