1982 Holden Commodore vs. 1954 Maserati A6G
To start off, 1982 Holden Commodore is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Maserati A6G. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Maserati A6G would be higher. At 1,984 cc (6 cylinders), 1954 Maserati A6G is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1954 Maserati A6G (168 HP @ 7400 RPM) has 90 more horse power than 1982 Holden Commodore. (78 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1954 Maserati A6G should accelerate faster than 1982 Holden Commodore. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Holden Commodore weights approximately 420 kg more than 1954 Maserati A6G.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Holden Commodore | 1954 Maserati A6G | |
Make | Holden | Maserati |
Model | Commodore | A6G |
Year Released | 1982 | 1954 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1892 cc | 1984 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 78 HP | 168 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 7400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1160 kg | 740 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2320 mm |