1983 Austin Maestro vs. 1997 Nissan Cima
To start off, 1997 Nissan Cima is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Austin Maestro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Austin Maestro would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 1997 Nissan Cima is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 Nissan Cima weights approximately 655 kg more than 1983 Austin Maestro.
Because 1997 Nissan Cima is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1997 Nissan Cima. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Austin Maestro, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Austin Maestro | 1997 Nissan Cima | |
Make | Austin | Nissan |
Model | Maestro | Cima |
Year Released | 1983 | 1997 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1275 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 67 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 875 kg | 1530 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4060 mm | 4880 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1770 mm |