1983 Austin Maestro vs. 2004 Ford E-250
To start off, 2004 Ford E-250 is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Austin Maestro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Austin Maestro would be higher. At 4,605 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Ford E-250 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford E-250 (225 HP @ 6150 RPM) has 159 more horse power than 1983 Austin Maestro. (66 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford E-250 should accelerate faster than 1983 Austin Maestro. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford E-250 weights approximately 1455 kg more than 1983 Austin Maestro. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford E-250 (389 Nm) has 287 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Austin Maestro. (102 Nm). This means 2004 Ford E-250 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Austin Maestro.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Austin Maestro | 2004 Ford E-250 | |
Make | Austin | Ford |
Model | Maestro | E-250 |
Year Released | 1983 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1275 cc | 4605 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 66 HP | 225 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6150 RPM |
Torque | 102 Nm | 389 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 70.7 mm | 90 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 81.3 mm | 90 mm |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 915 kg | 2370 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4060 mm | 5900 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 2020 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 2140 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 3510 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 34 L | 132 L |