1983 Cadillac Cimarron vs. 1978 Kia Brisa
To start off, 1983 Cadillac Cimarron is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Kia Brisa. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Kia Brisa would be higher. At 2,843 cc (6 cylinders), 1983 Cadillac Cimarron is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1983 Cadillac Cimarron (123 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 70 more horse power than 1978 Kia Brisa. (53 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1983 Cadillac Cimarron should accelerate faster than 1978 Kia Brisa. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1983 Cadillac Cimarron weights approximately 360 kg more than 1978 Kia Brisa. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1978 Kia Brisa is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1978 Kia Brisa. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Cadillac Cimarron, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Cadillac Cimarron | 1978 Kia Brisa | |
Make | Cadillac | Kia |
Model | Cimarron | Brisa |
Year Released | 1983 | 1978 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2843 cc | 985 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 53 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1150 kg | 790 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 3860 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1550 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2270 mm |