1983 Cadillac Cimarron vs. 2003 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2003 Ford Ecosport is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Cadillac Cimarron. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Cadillac Cimarron would be higher. At 2,843 cc (6 cylinders), 1983 Cadillac Cimarron is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1983 Cadillac Cimarron (123 HP) has 29 more horse power than 2003 Ford Ecosport. (94 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1983 Cadillac Cimarron should accelerate faster than 2003 Ford Ecosport.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Cadillac Cimarron | 2003 Ford Ecosport | |
Make | Cadillac | Ford |
Model | Cimarron | Ecosport |
Year Released | 1983 | 2003 |
Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2843 cc | 1000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 94 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 4228 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1980 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2490 mm |