1984 Audi Coupe vs. 2003 Renault Kangoo
To start off, 2003 Renault Kangoo is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Audi Coupe. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Audi Coupe would be higher. At 1,783 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Renault Kangoo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1984 Audi Coupe (90 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 26 more horse power than 2003 Renault Kangoo. (64 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1984 Audi Coupe should accelerate faster than 2003 Renault Kangoo.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1984 Audi Coupe (145 Nm @ 3300 RPM) has 27 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Renault Kangoo. (118 Nm @ 2250 RPM). This means 1984 Audi Coupe will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Renault Kangoo.
Compare all specifications:
1984 Audi Coupe | 2003 Renault Kangoo | |
Make | Audi | Renault |
Model | Coupe | Kangoo |
Year Released | 1984 | 2003 |
Body Type | Coupe | Panel Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1779 cc | 1783 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 90 HP | 64 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Torque | 145 Nm | 118 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3300 RPM | 2250 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 21.5:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4360 mm | 4060 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1850 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1850 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2630 mm |