1984 Jeep CJ7 vs. 1982 Maserati Bi Turbo
To start off, 1984 Jeep CJ7 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Maserati Bi Turbo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Maserati Bi Turbo would be higher. At 2,491 cc (6 cylinders), 1982 Maserati Bi Turbo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Maserati Bi Turbo (183 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 98 more horse power than 1984 Jeep CJ7. (85 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1982 Maserati Bi Turbo should accelerate faster than 1984 Jeep CJ7. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1984 Jeep CJ7 weights approximately 195 kg more than 1982 Maserati Bi Turbo.
Because 1984 Jeep CJ7 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Maserati Bi Turbo. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1984 Jeep CJ7 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1982 Maserati Bi Turbo (305 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 155 more torque (in Nm) than 1984 Jeep CJ7. (150 Nm @ 2750 RPM). This means 1982 Maserati Bi Turbo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1984 Jeep CJ7.
Compare all specifications:
1984 Jeep CJ7 | 1982 Maserati Bi Turbo | |
Make | Jeep | Maserati |
Model | CJ7 | Bi Turbo |
Year Released | 1984 | 1982 |
Engine Size | 1995 cc | 2491 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 85 HP | 183 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 150 Nm | 305 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2750 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1290 kg | 1095 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3900 mm | 4160 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1840 mm | 1310 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2510 mm |