1986 Caterham 1700 vs. 1966 Mini MK I
To start off, 1986 Caterham 1700 is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Mini MK I. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Mini MK I would be higher. At 1,692 cc (4 cylinders), 1986 Caterham 1700 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Caterham 1700 (168 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 134 more horse power than 1966 Mini MK I. (34 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1986 Caterham 1700 should accelerate faster than 1966 Mini MK I.
Because 1986 Caterham 1700 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1986 Caterham 1700. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1966 Mini MK I, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1986 Caterham 1700 | 1966 Mini MK I | |
| Make | Caterham | Mini |
| Model | 1700 | MK I |
| Year Released | 1986 | 1966 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1692 cc | 848 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 168 HP | 34 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 3390 mm | 3060 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1420 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1050 mm | 1360 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2040 mm |
