1986 Caterham 1700 vs. 1996 Holden Nova
To start off, 1996 Holden Nova is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Caterham 1700. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Caterham 1700 would be higher. At 1,692 cc (4 cylinders), 1986 Caterham 1700 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Caterham 1700 (168 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 63 more horse power than 1996 Holden Nova. (105 HP @ 5800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1986 Caterham 1700 should accelerate faster than 1996 Holden Nova.
Because 1986 Caterham 1700 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1986 Caterham 1700. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Holden Nova, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1996 Holden Nova has automatic transmission and 1986 Caterham 1700 has manual transmission. 1986 Caterham 1700 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1996 Holden Nova will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1986 Caterham 1700 | 1996 Holden Nova | |
| Make | Caterham | Holden |
| Model | 1700 | Nova |
| Year Released | 1986 | 1996 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1692 cc | 1586 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 168 HP | 105 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 5800 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Vehicle Length | 3390 mm | 4100 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1690 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1050 mm | 1390 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2470 mm |
