1986 Holden Camira vs. 2008 Mazda 6
To start off, 2008 Mazda 6 is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Holden Camira. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Holden Camira would be higher. At 2,261 cc (4 cylinders), 2008 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Mazda 6 (264 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 181 more horse power than 1986 Holden Camira. (83 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 1986 Holden Camira. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Mazda 6 weights approximately 339 kg more than 1986 Holden Camira. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Mazda 6 (380 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 254 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Holden Camira. (126 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2008 Mazda 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Holden Camira.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Holden Camira | 2008 Mazda 6 | |
Make | Holden | Mazda |
Model | Camira | 6 |
Year Released | 1986 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1598 cc | 2261 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 83 HP | 264 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 126 Nm | 380 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1015 kg | 1354 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4350 mm | 4680 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2680 mm |