1986 Jaguar XJ6 vs. 2002 Jeep Wrangler
To start off, 2002 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Jaguar XJ6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Jaguar XJ6 would be higher. At 3,960 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Jaguar XJ6 (221 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 31 more horse power than 2002 Jeep Wrangler. (190 HP @ 3800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1986 Jaguar XJ6 should accelerate faster than 2002 Jeep Wrangler.
Because 2002 Jeep Wrangler is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1986 Jaguar XJ6. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Jeep Wrangler will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1986 Jaguar XJ6 (336 Nm) has 17 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Jeep Wrangler. (319 Nm). This means 1986 Jaguar XJ6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Jeep Wrangler.
Compare all specifications:
| 1986 Jaguar XJ6 | 2002 Jeep Wrangler | |
| Make | Jaguar | Jeep |
| Model | XJ6 | Wrangler |
| Year Released | 1986 | 2002 |
| Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3590 cc | 3960 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 221 HP | 190 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 3800 RPM |
| Torque | 336 Nm | 319 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4940 mm | 3860 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1790 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2380 mm |
