1988 Chrysler Voyager vs. 2013 Smart Fortwo
To start off, 2013 Smart Fortwo is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1988 Chrysler Voyager. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1988 Chrysler Voyager would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1988 Chrysler Voyager weights approximately 680 kg more than 2013 Smart Fortwo.
Because 2013 Smart Fortwo is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2013 Smart Fortwo. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1988 Chrysler Voyager, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1988 Chrysler Voyager (233 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 141 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Smart Fortwo. (92 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 1988 Chrysler Voyager will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Smart Fortwo.
Compare all specifications:
| 1988 Chrysler Voyager | 2013 Smart Fortwo | |
| Make | Chrysler | Smart |
| Model | Voyager | Fortwo |
| Year Released | 1988 | 2013 |
| Body Type | Minivan | Convertible |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 139 HP | 0 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5800 RPM |
| Torque | 233 Nm | 92 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | 5-speed automatic |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1520 kg | 840 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 2695 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1559 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1680 mm | 1542 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2860 mm | 1867 mm |
