1989 Audi 200 vs. 1952 Austin A 70
To start off, 1989 Audi 200 is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Austin A 70. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Austin A 70 would be higher. At 2,226 cc (5 cylinders), 1989 Audi 200 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1989 Audi 200 (136 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 70 more horse power than 1952 Austin A 70. (66 HP @ 3700 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1989 Audi 200 should accelerate faster than 1952 Austin A 70. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1989 Audi 200 weights approximately 10 kg more than 1952 Austin A 70. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1952 Austin A 70 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Austin A 70. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1989 Audi 200, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1989 Audi 200 (188 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 31 more torque (in Nm) than 1952 Austin A 70. (157 Nm @ 1700 RPM). This means 1989 Audi 200 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1952 Austin A 70.
Compare all specifications:
1989 Audi 200 | 1952 Austin A 70 | |
Make | Audi | Austin |
Model | 200 | A 70 |
Year Released | 1989 | 1952 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2226 cc | 2200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 136 HP | 66 HP |
Engine RPM | 5700 RPM | 3700 RPM |
Torque | 188 Nm | 157 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 1700 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 81.1 mm | 79.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 86.4 mm | 111.1 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 6.8:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1290 kg | 1280 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 4260 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1670 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 2520 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 80 L | 56 L |