1989 Audi 200 vs. 2006 Isuzu KB
To start off, 2006 Isuzu KB is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Audi 200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Audi 200 would be higher. At 2,499 cc, 2006 Isuzu KB is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1989 Audi 200 (136 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 58 more horse power than 2006 Isuzu KB. (78 HP @ 3800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1989 Audi 200 should accelerate faster than 2006 Isuzu KB.
Because 2006 Isuzu KB is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Isuzu KB. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1989 Audi 200, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1989 Audi 200 (188 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 18 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Isuzu KB. (170 Nm @ 1800 RPM). This means 1989 Audi 200 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Isuzu KB.
Compare all specifications:
1989 Audi 200 | 2006 Isuzu KB | |
Make | Audi | Isuzu |
Model | 200 | KB |
Year Released | 1989 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2226 cc | 2499 cc |
Horse Power | 136 HP | 78 HP |
Engine RPM | 5700 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Torque | 188 Nm | 170 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 1800 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 81.1 mm | 93 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 86.4 mm | 92 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 18.5:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 4910 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1740 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 3060 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 80 L | 76 L |