1995 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 2005 Volkswagen Citi
To start off, 2005 Volkswagen Citi is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Chevrolet Camaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Chevrolet Camaro would be higher. At 3,391 cc (6 cylinders), 1995 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Chevrolet Camaro (158 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 75 more horse power than 2005 Volkswagen Citi. (83 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1995 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 2005 Volkswagen Citi. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Chevrolet Camaro weights approximately 556 kg more than 2005 Volkswagen Citi. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1995 Chevrolet Camaro is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1995 Chevrolet Camaro. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Volkswagen Citi, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1995 Chevrolet Camaro (271 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 156 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Volkswagen Citi. (115 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 1995 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Volkswagen Citi.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Chevrolet Camaro | 2005 Volkswagen Citi | |
Make | Chevrolet | Volkswagen |
Model | Camaro | Citi |
Year Released | 1995 | 2005 |
Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3391 cc | 1422 cc |
Horse Power | 158 HP | 83 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 271 Nm | 115 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 10.0:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1413 kg | 857 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2520 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 14 L/100km | 9.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 49 L |