1995 Daewoo No 1 vs. 2005 MCC Crossblade
To start off, 2005 MCC Crossblade is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Daewoo No 1. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Daewoo No 1 would be higher. At 1,498 cc, 1995 Daewoo No 1 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Daewoo No 1 (89 HP) has 19 more horse power than 2005 MCC Crossblade. (70 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1995 Daewoo No 1 should accelerate faster than 2005 MCC Crossblade.
Because 2005 MCC Crossblade is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 MCC Crossblade. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Daewoo No 1, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1995 Daewoo No 1 (137 Nm) has 35 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 MCC Crossblade. (102 Nm). This means 1995 Daewoo No 1 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 MCC Crossblade. 1995 Daewoo No 1 has automatic transmission and 2005 MCC Crossblade has manual transmission. 2005 MCC Crossblade will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1995 Daewoo No 1 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Daewoo No 1 | 2005 MCC Crossblade | |
Make | Daewoo | MCC |
Model | No 1 | Crossblade |
Year Released | 1995 | 2005 |
Engine Size | 1498 cc | 599 cc |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 70 HP |
Torque | 137 Nm | 102 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |