1996 Alfa Romeo 164 vs. 2010 Subaru Outback
To start off, 2010 Subaru Outback is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Alfa Romeo 164. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Alfa Romeo 164 would be higher. At 2,968 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Alfa Romeo 164 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Subaru Outback weights approximately 26 kg more than 1996 Alfa Romeo 164.
Because 2010 Subaru Outback is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1996 Alfa Romeo 164. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Subaru Outback will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1996 Alfa Romeo 164 has automatic transmission and 2010 Subaru Outback has manual transmission. 2010 Subaru Outback will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1996 Alfa Romeo 164 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Alfa Romeo 164 | 2010 Subaru Outback | |
| Make | Alfa Romeo | Subaru |
| Model | 164 | Outback |
| Year Released | 1996 | 2010 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Station Wagon |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2968 cc | 2500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | boxer |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 170 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | AWD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1510 kg | 1536 kg |
