1996 Dodge Ram vs. 1978 Volvo 264
To start off, 1996 Dodge Ram is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Volvo 264. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Volvo 264 would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1978 Volvo 264 weights approximately 370 kg more than 1996 Dodge Ram.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Dodge Ram (447 Nm) has 229 more torque (in Nm) than 1978 Volvo 264. (218 Nm). This means 1996 Dodge Ram will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1978 Volvo 264.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Dodge Ram | 1978 Volvo 264 | |
Make | Dodge | Volvo |
Model | Ram | 264 |
Year Released | 1996 | 1978 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 148 HP |
Torque | 447 Nm | 218 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1086 kg | 1456 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5190 mm | 4910 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1830 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3020 mm | 2650 mm |