1996 Lexus FLV vs. 1975 Mazda Cosmo
To start off, 1996 Lexus FLV is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Mazda Cosmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Mazda Cosmo would be higher. At 3,001 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Lexus FLV is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1975 Mazda Cosmo is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1975 Mazda Cosmo. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Lexus FLV, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1996 Lexus FLV has automatic transmission and 1975 Mazda Cosmo has manual transmission. 1975 Mazda Cosmo will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1996 Lexus FLV will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Lexus FLV | 1975 Mazda Cosmo | |
| Make | Lexus | Mazda |
| Model | FLV | Cosmo |
| Year Released | 1996 | 1975 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3001 cc | 1970 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 102 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 7 seats | 4 seats |
