1996 Mazda 626 vs. 2009 Renault Trafic
To start off, 2009 Renault Trafic is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Mazda 626. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Mazda 626 would be higher. At 1,870 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Renault Trafic is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Mazda 626 (104 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 4 more horse power than 2009 Renault Trafic. (100 HP @ 3500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Mazda 626 should accelerate faster than 2009 Renault Trafic.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Renault Trafic (241 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 92 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Mazda 626. (149 Nm @ 4300 RPM). This means 2009 Renault Trafic will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Mazda 626.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Mazda 626 | 2009 Renault Trafic | |
Make | Mazda | Renault |
Model | 626 | Trafic |
Year Released | 1996 | 2009 |
Body Type | Sedan | Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1840 cc | 1870 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 104 HP | 100 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Torque | 149 Nm | 241 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4300 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 80 mm | 80 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88 mm | 93 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 9 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 4790 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1950 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1910 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 3100 mm |