1997 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 1986 Renault 18
To start off, 1997 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Renault 18. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Renault 18 would be higher. At 5,665 cc (8 cylinders), 1997 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 Chevrolet Camaro weights approximately 389 kg more than 1986 Renault 18.
Because 1997 Chevrolet Camaro is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1997 Chevrolet Camaro. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Renault 18, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1997 Chevrolet Camaro (468 Nm) has 305 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Renault 18. (163 Nm). This means 1997 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Renault 18.
Compare all specifications:
1997 Chevrolet Camaro | 1986 Renault 18 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Renault |
Model | Camaro | 18 |
Year Released | 1997 | 1986 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5665 cc | 1993 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 104 HP |
Torque | 468 Nm | 163 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 99.1 mm | 88 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 91.4 mm | 82 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.1:1 | 9.2:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1524 kg | 1135 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4920 mm | 4470 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1890 mm | 1410 mm |