1997 Chrysler Concorde vs. 2010 Toyota 4Runner
To start off, 2010 Toyota 4Runner is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Chrysler Concorde. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Chrysler Concorde would be higher. At 4,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Toyota 4Runner is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Toyota 4Runner weights approximately 426 kg more than 1997 Chrysler Concorde.
Because 2010 Toyota 4Runner is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1997 Chrysler Concorde. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Toyota 4Runner will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1997 Chrysler Concorde | 2010 Toyota 4Runner | |
Make | Chrysler | Toyota |
Model | Concorde | 4Runner |
Year Released | 1997 | 2010 |
Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3299 cc | 4000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 270 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1570 kg | 1996 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5120 mm | 4823 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1925 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1816 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2789 mm |