1997 Jeep Grand Cherokee vs. 1999 Nissan C 52
To start off, 1999 Nissan C 52 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Jeep Grand Cherokee. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Jeep Grand Cherokee would be higher. At 3,960 cc (6 cylinders), 1997 Jeep Grand Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Jeep Grand Cherokee (175 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 23 more horse power than 1999 Nissan C 52. (152 HP @ 3600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1997 Jeep Grand Cherokee should accelerate faster than 1999 Nissan C 52. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 Jeep Grand Cherokee weights approximately 544 kg more than 1999 Nissan C 52. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1999 Nissan C 52 (354 Nm) has 53 more torque (in Nm) than 1997 Jeep Grand Cherokee. (301 Nm). This means 1999 Nissan C 52 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1997 Jeep Grand Cherokee.
Compare all specifications:
| 1997 Jeep Grand Cherokee | 1999 Nissan C 52 | |
| Make | Jeep | Nissan |
| Model | Grand Cherokee | C 52 |
| Year Released | 1997 | 1999 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 3960 cc | 3496 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 175 HP | 152 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Torque | 301 Nm | 354 Nm |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 1 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1810 kg | 1266 kg |
