1997 Mazda Xedos 9 vs. 2010 Citroen C-Crosser
To start off, 2010 Citroen C-Crosser is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Mazda Xedos 9. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Mazda Xedos 9 would be higher. At 2,496 cc (6 cylinders), 1997 Mazda Xedos 9 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Mazda Xedos 9 (165 HP) has 11 more horse power than 2010 Citroen C-Crosser. (154 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1997 Mazda Xedos 9 should accelerate faster than 2010 Citroen C-Crosser.
Because 2010 Citroen C-Crosser is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1997 Mazda Xedos 9. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Citroen C-Crosser will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Citroen C-Crosser (380 Nm) has 168 more torque (in Nm) than 1997 Mazda Xedos 9. (212 Nm). This means 2010 Citroen C-Crosser will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1997 Mazda Xedos 9.
Compare all specifications:
| 1997 Mazda Xedos 9 | 2010 Citroen C-Crosser | |
| Make | Mazda | Citroen |
| Model | Xedos 9 | C-Crosser |
| Year Released | 1997 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2496 cc | 2179 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 165 HP | 154 HP |
| Torque | 212 Nm | 380 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 84 mm | 85 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 74 mm | 96 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
