1998 BMW 323 vs. 2006 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2006 Cadillac CTS is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 BMW 323. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 BMW 323 would be higher. At 5,965 cc, 2006 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Cadillac CTS (400 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 230 more horse power than 1998 BMW 323. (170 HP @ 7400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1998 BMW 323.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Cadillac CTS (536 Nm) has 290 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 BMW 323. (246 Nm). This means 2006 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 BMW 323.
Compare all specifications:
1998 BMW 323 | 2006 Cadillac CTS | |
Make | BMW | Cadillac |
Model | 323 | CTS |
Year Released | 1998 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2494 cc | 5965 cc |
Horse Power | 170 HP | 400 HP |
Engine RPM | 7400 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 246 Nm | 536 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 4870 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1800 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2890 mm |