1998 Daewoo Matiz vs. 1959 DAF 600
To start off, 1998 Daewoo Matiz is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 DAF 600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 DAF 600 would be higher. At 796 cc (3 cylinders), 1998 Daewoo Matiz is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Daewoo Matiz (49 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 30 more horse power than 1959 DAF 600. (19 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1998 Daewoo Matiz should accelerate faster than 1959 DAF 600. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Daewoo Matiz weights approximately 223 kg more than 1959 DAF 600. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1959 DAF 600 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1959 DAF 600. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Daewoo Matiz, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1998 Daewoo Matiz (69 Nm @ 4600 RPM) has 24 more torque (in Nm) than 1959 DAF 600. (45 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1998 Daewoo Matiz will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1959 DAF 600.
Compare all specifications:
| 1998 Daewoo Matiz | 1959 DAF 600 | |
| Make | Daewoo | DAF |
| Model | Matiz | 600 |
| Year Released | 1998 | 1959 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 796 cc | 590 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 49 HP | 19 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 69 Nm | 45 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4600 RPM | 2500 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 68.5 mm | 76 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 72 mm | 65 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.3:1 | 7.1:1 |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 853 kg | 630 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3500 mm | 3610 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1500 mm | 1450 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1380 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2350 mm | 2060 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 35 L | 28 L |
