1998 Ford Royale vs. 2010 Citroen C-Crosser
To start off, 2010 Citroen C-Crosser is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Ford Royale. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Ford Royale would be higher. At 2,359 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Citroen C-Crosser is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Citroen C-Crosser (168 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 59 more horse power than 1998 Ford Royale. (109 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Citroen C-Crosser should accelerate faster than 1998 Ford Royale.
Because 2010 Citroen C-Crosser is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1998 Ford Royale. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Citroen C-Crosser will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Citroen C-Crosser (232 Nm @ 4100 RPM) has 59 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Ford Royale. (173 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2010 Citroen C-Crosser will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Ford Royale.
Compare all specifications:
1998 Ford Royale | 2010 Citroen C-Crosser | |
Make | Ford | Citroen |
Model | Royale | C-Crosser |
Year Released | 1998 | 2010 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | Crossover |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1983 cc | 2359 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 109 HP | 168 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 173 Nm | 232 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4100 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 86 mm | 88 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 86 mm | 87 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |