1998 Mazda 626 vs. 2010 Peugeot 207
To start off, 2010 Peugeot 207 is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Mazda 626. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Mazda 626 would be higher. At 1,840 cc (4 cylinders), 1998 Mazda 626 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Peugeot 207 (152 HP) has 63 more horse power than 1998 Mazda 626. (89 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Peugeot 207 should accelerate faster than 1998 Mazda 626.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1998 Mazda 626 | 2010 Peugeot 207 | |
Make | Mazda | Peugeot |
Model | 626 | 207 |
Year Released | 1998 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1840 cc | 1600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 152 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 4044 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1972 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1397 mm |