1999 Alfa Romeo Bella vs. 2002 Suzuki F1
To start off, 2002 Suzuki F1 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Alfa Romeo Bella. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Alfa Romeo Bella would be higher. At 2,959 cc (6 cylinders), 1999 Alfa Romeo Bella is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Alfa Romeo Bella (223 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 156 more horse power than 2002 Suzuki F1. (67 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1999 Alfa Romeo Bella should accelerate faster than 2002 Suzuki F1.
Because 2002 Suzuki F1 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2002 Suzuki F1. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Alfa Romeo Bella, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Alfa Romeo Bella (282 Nm) has 176 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Suzuki F1. (106 Nm). This means 1999 Alfa Romeo Bella will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Suzuki F1. 2002 Suzuki F1 has automatic transmission and 1999 Alfa Romeo Bella has manual transmission. 1999 Alfa Romeo Bella will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2002 Suzuki F1 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Alfa Romeo Bella | 2002 Suzuki F1 | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Suzuki |
Model | Bella | F1 |
Year Released | 1999 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 2959 cc | 1995 cc |
Horse Power | 223 HP | 67 HP |
Engine RPM | 6200 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 282 Nm | 106 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |