1999 Lotec C 1000 vs. 1973 Rover 2000
To start off, 1999 Lotec C 1000 is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Rover 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Rover 2000 would be higher. At 5,498 cc (8 cylinders), 1999 Lotec C 1000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Lotec C 1000 (843 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 737 more horse power than 1973 Rover 2000. (106 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1999 Lotec C 1000 should accelerate faster than 1973 Rover 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1973 Rover 2000 weights approximately 215 kg more than 1999 Lotec C 1000.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Lotec C 1000 (990 Nm @ 3900 RPM) has 818 more torque (in Nm) than 1973 Rover 2000. (172 Nm @ 3750 RPM). This means 1999 Lotec C 1000 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1973 Rover 2000.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Lotec C 1000 | 1973 Rover 2000 | |
Make | Lotec | Rover |
Model | C 1000 | 2000 |
Year Released | 1999 | 1973 |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 5498 cc | 1978 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 843 HP | 106 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 990 Nm | 172 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3900 RPM | 3750 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1080 kg | 1295 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4300 mm | 4550 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1150 mm | 1400 mm |