1999 Renault Clio vs. 2011 Lancia Voyager
To start off, 2011 Lancia Voyager is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Renault Clio. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Renault Clio would be higher. At 3,604 cc (6 cylinders), 2011 Lancia Voyager is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Lancia Voyager (283 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 177 more horse power than 1999 Renault Clio. (106 HP @ 5750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Lancia Voyager should accelerate faster than 1999 Renault Clio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Lancia Voyager weights approximately 1115 kg more than 1999 Renault Clio. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Lancia Voyager (352 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 204 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Renault Clio. (148 Nm @ 3750 RPM). This means 2011 Lancia Voyager will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Renault Clio. 2011 Lancia Voyager has automatic transmission and 1999 Renault Clio has manual transmission. 1999 Renault Clio will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2011 Lancia Voyager will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Renault Clio | 2011 Lancia Voyager | |
Make | Renault | Lancia |
Model | Clio | Voyager |
Year Released | 1999 | 2011 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1598 cc | 3604 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 106 HP | 283 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Torque | 148 Nm | 352 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3750 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 995 kg | 2110 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3780 mm | 5151 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1999 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1725 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 3078 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 6 L/100km | 9.4 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 9.4 L/100km | 13.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 76 L |