2000 AC Aceca vs. 2010 Ford F-450
To start off, 2010 Ford F-450 is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 AC Aceca. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 AC Aceca would be higher. At 6,400 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Ford F-450 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Ford F-450 (326 HP @ 3000 RPM) has 25 more horse power than 2000 AC Aceca. (301 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Ford F-450 should accelerate faster than 2000 AC Aceca.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Ford F-450 (814 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 407 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 AC Aceca. (407 Nm @ 4800 RPM). This means 2010 Ford F-450 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 AC Aceca.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 AC Aceca | 2010 Ford F-450 | |
| Make | AC | Ford |
| Model | Aceca | F-450 |
| Year Released | 2000 | 2010 |
| Body Type | Convertible | Pickup |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4600 cc | 6400 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 301 HP | 326 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Torque | 407 Nm | 814 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4800 RPM | 2000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 6670 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 2430 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 2030 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 4390 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 90 L | 144 L |
