2000 Acura MDX vs. 2011 Citroen C-Crosser
To start off, 2011 Citroen C-Crosser is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Acura MDX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Acura MDX would be higher. At 3,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Acura MDX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Acura MDX (261 HP) has 107 more horse power than 2011 Citroen C-Crosser. (154 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Acura MDX should accelerate faster than 2011 Citroen C-Crosser.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Citroen C-Crosser (380 Nm) has 34 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Acura MDX. (346 Nm). This means 2011 Citroen C-Crosser will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Acura MDX. 2000 Acura MDX has automatic transmission and 2011 Citroen C-Crosser has manual transmission. 2011 Citroen C-Crosser will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Acura MDX will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Acura MDX | 2011 Citroen C-Crosser | |
Make | Acura | Citroen |
Model | MDX | C-Crosser |
Year Released | 2000 | 2011 |
Body Type | SUV | Crossover |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3500 cc | 2179 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 261 HP | 154 HP |
Torque | 346 Nm | 380 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |