2000 Audi Rosemeyer vs. 1967 Nissan Cedric
To start off, 2000 Audi Rosemeyer is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 8,003 cc (16 cylinders), 2000 Audi Rosemeyer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Audi Rosemeyer (630 HP) has 516 more horse power than 1967 Nissan Cedric. (114 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Audi Rosemeyer should accelerate faster than 1967 Nissan Cedric. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Nissan Cedric weights approximately 390 kg more than 2000 Audi Rosemeyer.
Let's talk about torque, 2000 Audi Rosemeyer (1,032 Nm) has 866 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Nissan Cedric. (166 Nm). This means 2000 Audi Rosemeyer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Nissan Cedric.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Audi Rosemeyer | 1967 Nissan Cedric | |
Make | Audi | Nissan |
Model | Rosemeyer | Cedric |
Year Released | 2000 | 1967 |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 8003 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 16 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | W | in-line |
Horse Power | 630 HP | 114 HP |
Torque | 1032 Nm | 166 Nm |
Vehicle Weight | 900 kg | 1290 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4550 mm | 4700 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1930 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1250 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2920 mm | 2700 mm |