2000 Audi RS4 vs. 1952 Buick 40
To start off, 2000 Audi RS4 is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Buick 40 would be higher. At 4,066 cc (8 cylinders), 1952 Buick 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Audi RS4 (376 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 258 more horse power than 1952 Buick 40. (118 HP @ 3600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Audi RS4 should accelerate faster than 1952 Buick 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Buick 40 weights approximately 50 kg more than 2000 Audi RS4.
Because 2000 Audi RS4 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1952 Buick 40. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Audi RS4 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Audi RS4 (449 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 157 more torque (in Nm) than 1952 Buick 40. (292 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2000 Audi RS4 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1952 Buick 40.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Audi RS4 | 1952 Buick 40 | |
Make | Audi | Buick |
Model | RS4 | 40 |
Year Released | 2000 | 1952 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2669 cc | 4066 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 376 HP | 118 HP |
Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Torque | 449 Nm | 292 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 81 mm | 78.6 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 86.4 mm | 104.8 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1585 kg | 1635 kg |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1950 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 3090 mm |