2000 BMW Z9 vs. 1963 Ford Taunus
To start off, 2000 BMW Z9 is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Ford Taunus. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Ford Taunus would be higher. At 4,398 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 BMW Z9 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 BMW Z9 (282 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 244 more horse power than 1963 Ford Taunus. (38 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 BMW Z9 should accelerate faster than 1963 Ford Taunus. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 BMW Z9 weights approximately 841 kg more than 1963 Ford Taunus. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2000 BMW Z9 | 1963 Ford Taunus | |
Make | BMW | Ford |
Model | Z9 | Taunus |
Year Released | 2000 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4398 cc | 1183 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 282 HP | 38 HP |
Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 2400 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 92 mm | 80.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 82.7 mm | 58.9 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 7.8:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1686 kg | 845 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 4250 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1980 mm | 1600 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1290 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2530 mm |