2000 Cadillac Catera vs. 1999 Renault Zo
To start off, 2000 Cadillac Catera is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Renault Zo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Renault Zo would be higher. At 2,962 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Cadillac Catera is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Cadillac Catera (200 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 126 more horse power than 1999 Renault Zo. (74 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Cadillac Catera should accelerate faster than 1999 Renault Zo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Cadillac Catera weights approximately 171 kg more than 1999 Renault Zo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, both vehicles can yield 260 Nm of torque. So under normal driving conditions, the ability to climb up hills and pull heavy equipment should be relatively similar for both vehicles.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Cadillac Catera | 1999 Renault Zo | |
Make | Cadillac | Renault |
Model | Catera | Zo |
Year Released | 2000 | 1999 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 2962 cc | 1999 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 200 HP | 74 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 260 Nm | 260 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1746 kg | 1575 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2580 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 83 L |