2000 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 1976 Holden Statesman
To start off, 2000 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Holden Statesman. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Holden Statesman would be higher. At 9,371 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Chevrolet Camaro (770 HP) has 557 more horse power than 1976 Holden Statesman. (213 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 1976 Holden Statesman. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1976 Holden Statesman weights approximately 358 kg more than 2000 Chevrolet Camaro.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Chevrolet Camaro (926 Nm) has 526 more torque (in Nm) than 1976 Holden Statesman. (400 Nm). This means 2000 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1976 Holden Statesman.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Chevrolet Camaro | 1976 Holden Statesman | |
Make | Chevrolet | Holden |
Model | Camaro | Statesman |
Year Released | 2000 | 1976 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 9371 cc | 5042 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 770 HP | 213 HP |
Torque | 926 Nm | 400 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1187 kg | 1545 kg |
Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 1890 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 2900 mm |