2000 Ford Puma vs. 1953 Renault Juva
To start off, 2000 Ford Puma is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Renault Juva. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Renault Juva would be higher. At 1,387 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Ford Puma is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Ford Puma weights approximately 200 kg more than 1953 Renault Juva.
Because 1953 Renault Juva is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1953 Renault Juva. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Ford Puma, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Ford Puma | 1953 Renault Juva | |
Make | Ford | Renault |
Model | Puma | Juva |
Year Released | 2000 | 1953 |
Engine Size | 1387 cc | 1001 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1010 kg | 810 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3990 mm | 3760 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1410 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1620 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2360 mm |