2000 Ford ST 460 vs. 1998 Seat Inca Kombi
To start off, 2000 Ford ST 460 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Seat Inca Kombi. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Seat Inca Kombi would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Ford ST 460 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford ST 460 (460 HP @ 6150 RPM) has 401 more horse power than 1998 Seat Inca Kombi. (59 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford ST 460 should accelerate faster than 1998 Seat Inca Kombi.
Because 2000 Ford ST 460 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Ford ST 460. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Seat Inca Kombi, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Ford ST 460 (178 Nm) has 71 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Seat Inca Kombi. (107 Nm). This means 2000 Ford ST 460 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Seat Inca Kombi.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Ford ST 460 | 1998 Seat Inca Kombi | |
Make | Ford | Seat |
Model | ST 460 | Inca Kombi |
Year Released | 2000 | 1998 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4600 cc | 1391 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 460 HP | 59 HP |
Engine RPM | 6150 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 178 Nm | 107 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |