2000 Ford TL-50 vs. 1999 Rolls-Royce Silver Spur
To start off, 2000 Ford TL-50 is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Rolls-Royce Silver Spur. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Rolls-Royce Silver Spur would be higher. At 6,750 cc (8 cylinders), 1999 Rolls-Royce Silver Spur is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Ford TL-50 | 1999 Rolls-Royce Silver Spur | |
| Make | Ford | Rolls-Royce |
| Model | TL-50 | Silver Spur |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1999 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1798 cc | 6750 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 128 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 3170 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 37 L | 108 L |
