2000 Ford TL-50 vs. 2013 Rolls-Royce Phantom
To start off, 2013 Rolls-Royce Phantom is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Ford TL-50. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Ford TL-50 would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Rolls-Royce Phantom weights approximately 1347 kg more than 2000 Ford TL-50.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Rolls-Royce Phantom (720 Nm) has 150 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Ford TL-50. (570 Nm). This means 2013 Rolls-Royce Phantom will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Ford TL-50.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Ford TL-50 | 2013 Rolls-Royce Phantom | |
| Make | Ford | Rolls-Royce |
| Model | TL-50 | Phantom |
| Year Released | 2000 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 128 HP | 0 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5350 RPM |
| Torque | 570 Nm | 720 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | 8-speed automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 1302 kg | 2649 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 3570 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 37 L | 100 L |
