2000 Holden GTS-R vs. 1998 Rover 200
To start off, 2000 Holden GTS-R is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Rover 200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Rover 200 would be higher. At 5,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Holden GTS-R is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Holden GTS-R (644 Nm) has 517 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Rover 200. (127 Nm). This means 2000 Holden GTS-R will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Rover 200.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Holden GTS-R | 1998 Rover 200 | |
| Make | Holden | Rover |
| Model | GTS-R | 200 |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1998 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5000 cc | 1396 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 102 HP |
| Torque | 644 Nm | 127 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
