2000 Lada Vaz vs. 2013 Dodge CHARGER
To start off, 2013 Dodge CHARGER is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Lada Vaz. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Lada Vaz would be higher. At 5,700 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 Dodge CHARGER is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Dodge CHARGER (365 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 284 more horse power than 2000 Lada Vaz. (81 HP @ 5400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Dodge CHARGER should accelerate faster than 2000 Lada Vaz. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Dodge CHARGER weights approximately 884 kg more than 2000 Lada Vaz. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2000 Lada Vaz is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2013 Dodge CHARGER. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Lada Vaz will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Dodge CHARGER (536 Nm) has 419 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Lada Vaz. (117 Nm). This means 2013 Dodge CHARGER will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Lada Vaz.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Lada Vaz | 2013 Dodge CHARGER | |
Make | Lada | Dodge |
Model | Vaz | CHARGER |
Year Released | 2000 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1999 cc | 5700 cc |
Horse Power | 81 HP | 365 HP |
Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 117 Nm | 536 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 5-speed automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1045 kg | 1929 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 3052 mm |