2001 Audi A3 vs. 1967 Mercury Park Lane

To start off, 2001 Audi A3 is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Mercury Park Lane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Mercury Park Lane would be higher. At 6,722 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 Mercury Park Lane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Mercury Park Lane (325 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 212 more horse power than 2001 Audi A3. (113 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1967 Mercury Park Lane should accelerate faster than 2001 Audi A3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Mercury Park Lane weights approximately 135 kg more than 2001 Audi A3. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1967 Mercury Park Lane is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1967 Mercury Park Lane. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Audi A3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1967 Mercury Park Lane (602 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 282 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Audi A3. (320 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1967 Mercury Park Lane will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Audi A3.

Compare all specifications:

2001 Audi A3 1967 Mercury Park Lane
Make Audi Mercury
Model A3 Park Lane
Year Released 2001 1967
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1597 cc 6722 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 2 valves
Horse Power 113 HP 325 HP
Engine RPM 5800 RPM 4600 RPM
Torque 320 Nm 602 Nm
Torque RPM 4000 RPM 2800 RPM
Engine Bore Size 76.5 mm 103 mm
Drive Type Front Rear
Vehicle Weight 1225 kg 1360 kg
Vehicle Length 4210 mm 5560 mm
Vehicle Width 1770 mm 1990 mm
Vehicle Height 1430 mm 1430 mm
Wheelbase Size 2580 mm 3130 mm


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]