2001 Citroen Xsara vs. 1962 Volvo 220
To start off, 2001 Citroen Xsara is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Volvo 220. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Volvo 220 would be higher. At 1,778 cc (4 cylinders), 1962 Volvo 220 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Volvo 220 (74 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 2 more horse power than 2001 Citroen Xsara. (72 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1962 Volvo 220 should accelerate faster than 2001 Citroen Xsara. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Citroen Xsara weights approximately 65 kg more than 1962 Volvo 220.
Let's talk about torque, 1962 Volvo 220 (144 Nm @ 2300 RPM) has 24 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Citroen Xsara. (120 Nm @ 3400 RPM). This means 1962 Volvo 220 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Citroen Xsara.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Citroen Xsara | 1962 Volvo 220 | |
Make | Citroen | Volvo |
Model | Xsara | 220 |
Year Released | 2001 | 1962 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1360 cc | 1778 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 72 HP | 74 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Torque | 120 Nm | 144 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3400 RPM | 2300 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1080 kg | 1015 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4200 mm | 4460 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1620 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1510 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2610 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 45 L |