2001 Ford Econovan vs. 2011 Nissan Note
To start off, 2011 Nissan Note is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Ford Econovan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Ford Econovan would be higher. At 1,996 cc (4 cylinders), 2001 Ford Econovan is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Ford Econovan (96 HP) has 7 more horse power than 2011 Nissan Note. (89 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2001 Ford Econovan should accelerate faster than 2011 Nissan Note. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Ford Econovan weights approximately 393 kg more than 2011 Nissan Note. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2001 Ford Econovan is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2001 Ford Econovan. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Nissan Note, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Ford Econovan | 2011 Nissan Note | |
Make | Ford | Nissan |
Model | Econovan | Note |
Year Released | 2001 | 2011 |
Body Type | Van | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1996 cc | 1386 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 96 HP | 89 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1445 kg | 1052 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4290 mm | 4083 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1691 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1870 mm | 1550 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2600 mm |