2001 Lancia Nea vs. 1983 Ford Ranger
To start off, 2001 Lancia Nea is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Ford Ranger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Ford Ranger would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 1983 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Lancia Nea (148 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 3 more horse power than 1983 Ford Ranger. (145 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2001 Lancia Nea should accelerate faster than 1983 Ford Ranger.
Because 1983 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2001 Lancia Nea. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Lancia Nea | 1983 Ford Ranger | |
Make | Lancia | Ford |
Model | Nea | Ranger |
Year Released | 2001 | 1983 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2445 cc | 3000 cc |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 145 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |