2002 AC Aceca vs. 1952 MG YB
To start off, 2002 AC Aceca is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 MG YB. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 MG YB would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 AC Aceca is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 AC Aceca (302 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 257 more horse power than 1952 MG YB. (45 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 AC Aceca should accelerate faster than 1952 MG YB. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 AC Aceca weights approximately 450 kg more than 1952 MG YB. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 AC Aceca (407 Nm @ 4800 RPM) has 328 more torque (in Nm) than 1952 MG YB. (79 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2002 AC Aceca will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1952 MG YB.
Compare all specifications:
2002 AC Aceca | 1952 MG YB | |
Make | AC | MG |
Model | Aceca | YB |
Year Released | 2002 | 1952 |
Engine Size | 4600 cc | 1250 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 302 HP | 45 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 407 Nm | 79 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4800 RPM | 2400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1510 kg | 1060 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 4170 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1510 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2520 mm |